X-Ray Hesitancy: Patients' Radiophobic Concerns Over Medical X-rays.
Paul A OakleyDeed E HarrisonPublished in: Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society (2020)
All too often the family physician, orthopedic surgeon, dentist or chiropractor is met with radiophobic concerns about X-ray imaging in the clinical setting. These concerns, however, are unwarranted fears based on common but ill-informed and perpetuated ideology versus current understanding of the effects of low-dose radiation exposures. Themes of X-ray hesitancy come in 3 forms: 1. All radiation exposures are harmful (i.e. carcinogenic); 2. Radiation exposures are cumulative; 3. Children are more susceptible to radiation. Herein we address these concerns and find that low-dose radiation activates the body's adaptive responses and leads to reduced cancers. Low-dose radiation is not cumulative as long as enough time (e.g. 24 hrs) passes prior to a repeated exposure, and any damage is repaired, removed, or eliminated. Children have more active immune systems; the literature shows children are no more affected than adults by radiation exposures. Medical X-rays present a small, insignificant addition to background radiation exposure that is not likely to cause harm. Doctors and patients alike should be better informed of the lack of risks from diagnostic radiation and the decision to image should rely on the best evidence, unique needs of the patient, and the expertise of the physician-not radiophobia.
Keyphrases
- low dose
- air pollution
- high resolution
- radiation induced
- end stage renal disease
- ejection fraction
- emergency department
- high dose
- primary care
- young adults
- radiation therapy
- oxidative stress
- machine learning
- risk assessment
- computed tomography
- magnetic resonance
- magnetic resonance imaging
- dual energy
- minimally invasive
- patient reported
- polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
- fluorescence imaging
- medical students