Login / Signup

Dense networks that do not synchronize and sparse ones that do.

Alex TownsendMichael StillmanSteven H Strogatz
Published in: Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.) (2020)
Consider any network of n identical Kuramoto oscillators in which each oscillator is coupled bidirectionally with unit strength to at least μ(n-1) other oscillators. Then, there is a critical value of μ above which the system is guaranteed to converge to the in-phase synchronous state for almost all initial conditions. The precise value of μ remains unknown. In 2018, Ling, Xu, and Bandeira proved that if each oscillator is coupled to at least 79.29% of all the others, global synchrony is ensured. In 2019, Lu and Steinerberger improved this bound to 78.89%. Here, we find clues that the critical connectivity may be exactly 75%. Our methods yield a slight improvement on the best known lower bound on the critical connectivity from 68.18% to 68.28%. We also consider the opposite end of the connectivity spectrum, where the networks are sparse rather than dense. In this regime, we ask how few edges one needs to add to a ring of n oscillators to turn it into a globally synchronizing network. We prove a partial result: all the twisted states in a ring of size n=2m can be destabilized by adding just O(nlog2⁡n) edges. To finish the proof, one needs to rule out all other candidate attractors. We have done this for n≤8 but the problem remains open for larger n. Thus, even for systems as simple as Kuramoto oscillators, much remains to be learned about dense networks that do not globally synchronize and sparse ones that do.
Keyphrases
  • resting state
  • functional connectivity
  • white matter
  • neural network
  • minimally invasive
  • sensitive detection
  • multiple sclerosis
  • living cells
  • network analysis