Considerations from the College of American Pathologists for Implementation of an Assay for SARS-CoV-2 Testing after a Change in Regulatory Status.
David R PeaperDaniel D RhoadsKaede V SullivanMarc R CouturierRomney M HumphriesIsabella W MartinFrederick S NolteMarie-Claire RowlinsonRosemary C ShePatricia J SimnerElitza S TheelChristina M WojewodaPublished in: Journal of clinical microbiology (2021)
The U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) regulates the marketing of manufacturers' in vitro diagnostic tests (IVDs), including assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. The U.S. government's Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) of 1988 regulates the studies that a clinical diagnostic laboratory needs to perform for an IVD before placing it into use. Until recently, the FDA has authorized the marketing of SARS-CoV-2 IVDs exclusively through the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) pathway. The regulatory landscape continues to evolve, and IVDs will eventually be required to pass through conventional non-EUA FDA review pathways once the emergency declaration is terminated, in order to continue to be marketed as an IVD in the United States. When FDA regulatory status of an IVD changes or is anticipated to change, the laboratory should review manufacturer information and previously performed internal verification studies to determine what, if any, additional studies are needed before implementing the non-EUA version of the IVD in accordance with CLIA regulations. Herein, the College of American Pathologists' Microbiology Committee provides guidance for how to approach regulatory considerations when an IVD is converted from EUA to non-EUA status.
Keyphrases
- sars cov
- transcription factor
- respiratory syndrome coronavirus
- drug administration
- healthcare
- emergency department
- public health
- case control
- high throughput
- primary care
- quality improvement
- risk assessment
- coronavirus disease
- loop mediated isothermal amplification
- social media
- climate change
- label free
- psychometric properties