Login / Signup

Comparison of the 2022 world health organization classification and international consensus classification in myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms.

Wan-Hsuan LeeChien-Chin LinCheng-Hong TsaiFeng-Ming TienMin-Yen LoMei-Hsuan TsengYuan-Yeh KuoShan-Chi YuMing-Chih LiuChang-Tsu YuanYi-Tsung YangMing-Kai ChuangBor-Sheng KoJih-Luh TangHsun-I SunYi-Kuang ChuangHwei-Fang TienHsin-An HouWen-Chien Chou
Published in: Blood cancer journal (2024)
In 2022, two novel classification systems for myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) have been proposed: the International Consensus Classification (ICC) and the 2022 World Health Organization (WHO-2022) classification. These two contemporary systems exhibit numerous shared features but also diverge significantly in terminology and the definition of new entities. Thus, we retrospectively validated the ICC and WHO-2022 classification and found that both systems promoted efficient segregation of this heterogeneous disease. After examining the distinction between the two systems, we showed that a peripheral blood blast percentage ≥ 5% indicates adverse survival. Identifying MDS/acute myeloid leukemia with MDS-related gene mutations or cytogenetic abnormalities helps differentiate survival outcomes. In MDS, not otherwise specified patients, those diagnosed with hypoplastic MDS and single lineage dysplasia displayed a trend of superior survival compared to other low-risk MDS patients. Furthermore, the impact of bone marrow fibrosis on survival was less pronounced within the ICC framework. Allogeneic transplantation appears to improve outcomes for patients diagnosed with MDS with excess blasts in the ICC. Therefore, we proposed an integrated system that may lead to the accurate diagnosis and advancement of future research for MDS. Prospective studies are warranted to validate this refined classification.
Keyphrases