Comparison of three maternal composite sheep breeds managed under pasture lambing and purebred or terminal mating systems: ewe body weight, reproductive efficiency, and longevity.
Thomas W MurphyBrad A FrekingGary L BennettPublished in: Journal of animal science (2023)
Extensive sheep systems have lower inputs (e.g., feed, labor, infrastructure) but, generally, lower outputs per ewe than intensively managed flocks. Average ewe prolificacy is low (< 1.1 lambs per ewe) across the United States and traditional expectation is that costs required to support larger litters will not be recovered due to greater lamb mortality. The Composite-IV (C-IV) is a 50% Romanov, 25% Katahdin, and 25% White Dorper hair sheep developed and selected for enhanced reproductive efficiency at the U.S. Meat Animal Research Center. Objectives of the current study were to compare productivity of C-IV ewes (N = 404) to Katahdin (N = 342) and Polypay (N = 390), two popular maternal composite breeds, in a lower-input system. Experimental ewes were exposed to either rams of their own breed or Texel rams for the first time at 7 mo of age and remained in the same mating system for up to 4 yr. Ewes lambed on pasture from May to June and were expected to rear their lambs in the absence of supplemental feed and with minimal intervention. The ewe age × breed interaction effect impacted all annually recorded traits (P < 0.01) including number and total weight of lamb marketed at 25 wk per ewe exposed to mating (LS25 and LW25, respectively). Within all ages, LS25 of C-IV was greater (1.2 to 1.63 lambs; P < 0.01) than Katahdin (0.71 to 1.17 lambs) and Polypay (0.68 to 1.26 lambs) which were similar. At 1, 2, and 3-yr of age, C-IV ewes had, on average, 12 to 17 kg greater LW25 (P ≤ 0.01) than other breeds. Polypay LW25 was similar to Katahdin at 1 yr of age, but 8 to 13 kg greater (P < 0.01) at older ages. At 4 yr of age, LW25 was similar for C-IV and Polypay (63 and 62 kg, respectively). Overall, Texel mating improved LW25 by 3 kg compared to purebred mating (P < 0.01). Twin litters were most common within mature ewes (> 1 yr) of all breeds (52% to 65%); however, the proportion of triplet litters was numerically greater for C-IV (13%) than Katahdin (1%) or Polypay (4%). The frequency of mature ewes that gave birth to and reared twins (75% to 82%) was high for all breeds. Most triplet-bearing mature C-IV ewes reared twins (43%) though many reared triplets (39%). Ewe reproductive efficiency can be enhanced in lower-input systems by utilizing additive breed effects and heterosis in a complimentary crossbreeding program. More research is needed to identify indicator traits associated with lamb survival and to derive appropriate levels of prolificacy to fit specific management constraints.