Delivery of End-of-Life Care in Patients Requesting Withdrawal of a Left Ventricular Assist Device Using Intranasal Opioids and Benzodiazepines.
Evan J WiensJana PilkeyJonathan K WongPublished in: Journal of palliative care (2019)
With the increasing prevalence of the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in patients with end-stage cardiomyopathies, an increasing number of these patients are dying of noncardiac conditions. It is likely that the palliative care clinician will have an ever-increasing role in managing end of life for patients with LVADs, including discontinuation of LVAD support. There exists a paucity of literature describing strategies for effective delivery of palliative care in patients requesting discontinuation of LVAD therapy. Here, we present a case of a patient with metastatic cancer who requested LVAD discontinuation. Because of practical concerns and patient preference, the patient did not have intravenous (IV) access and medications requiring IV administration could not be used. Therefore, a strategy using intranasal midazolam and sufentanil was applied, the LVAD was deactivated, and the patient died comfortably. This case is, to our knowledge, the first to describe a strategy for delivery of palliative care in patients requesting discontinuation of LVAD support, particularly in the absence of IV access. Such a strategy may be applicable to patients wishing to die at home, and therefore allow greater latitude for patients and clinicians in their approach to the end of life.
Keyphrases
- end stage renal disease
- palliative care
- chronic kidney disease
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- left ventricular assist device
- prognostic factors
- peritoneal dialysis
- squamous cell carcinoma
- small cell lung cancer
- healthcare
- systematic review
- patient reported outcomes
- mesenchymal stem cells
- low dose
- high dose
- bone marrow
- young adults
- chronic pain
- cell therapy
- replacement therapy
- smoking cessation