Login / Signup

Breaking Boundaries: Toward Consistent Gender-Sensitive Language in Sexual and Reproductive Health Guidelines.

Rhonda M GaradMahnaz Bahri KhomamiMaureen BusbyTania S BurgertJacky BoivinHelena J Teede
Published in: Seminars in reproductive medicine (2023)
This review assesses gender-sensitive language in sexual and reproductive health (SRH) guidelines, including a guideline for polycystic ovary syndrome. We conducted a systematic search across databases like Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane until July 31, 2023, using terms related to gender-inclusivity, SRH, and guideline protocols. Criteria for inclusion were gender-sensitive language, SRH focus, and guideline relevance, excluding non-English articles or those without policy considerations. Our search yielded 25 studies, with 6 included for qualitative synthesis. Results showed significant gaps in using gender-sensitive language in SRH guidelines. The debate on this language mirrors broader societal discourse. Recognizing gender diversity is essential for research, clinical practices, and societal norms. While promoting inclusion, drawbacks like unintended erasure or miscommunication should also be addressed. A gender-additive approach balances inclusivity and biological accuracy. Precise and inclusive discourse is crucial. Future research should focus on systemic approaches in the SRH sector.
Keyphrases
  • mental health
  • autism spectrum disorder
  • polycystic ovary syndrome
  • healthcare
  • primary care
  • clinical practice
  • public health
  • insulin resistance
  • systematic review
  • machine learning
  • deep learning
  • skeletal muscle