Login / Signup

Does evidence support measuring spore counts to identify dampness or mold in buildings? A literature review.

Mark J MendellRachel I Adams
Published in: Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology (2021)
Evidence did not validate current interpretations of spore count data for identifying single damp homes. Thus, such interpretations rest primarily on professional judgment. An additional series of informative but ineligible articles demonstrated an unconventional, more powerful "statistically based" comparison of multiple indoor vs. outdoor spore counts for identifying elevated indoor spores (and assumed D/M). Findings suggest that validation of enhanced spore trap approaches, including more samples indoors and outdoors plus statistically based comparisons of specific fungal groups, may allow evidence-based microbial identification of probable dampness in individual buildings.
Keyphrases
  • bacillus subtilis
  • air pollution
  • particulate matter
  • peripheral blood
  • health risk
  • microbial community
  • case report
  • electronic health record
  • machine learning
  • big data
  • risk assessment
  • deep learning
  • data analysis