Win-win interactions: Results and implications of a user needs assessment of clinical and translational scientists.
Shannon L CaseyAmanda Siebert-EvenstoneAllan R BrasierPublished in: Journal of clinical and translational science (2023)
This study yielded clear differences in support needs between scientists based upon their years in research and diversity of identities. The validation of qualitative findings, through quantification with ENA, enables robust identification of unique needs of CTR investigators. It is critically important to the future of CTR that scientists are provided with supports throughout the career. Delivery of that support in efficient and timely ways improves scientific outcomes. Advocacy at the level of the institution for under-represented scientists is of utmost importance.
Keyphrases