A comparative evaluation of midfacial soft tissue and nasal bone changes with two maxillary protraction protocols: Tooth-borne vs skeletal-anchored facemasks.
Young-Kwang JangDong-Hwa ChungJin-Woo LeeSang-Min LeeJae Hyun ParkPublished in: Orthodontics & craniofacial research (2020)
In the treatment of growing patients with Class III malocclusions with maxillary deficiency, it was possible to achieve significantly greater advancement in the midfacial area with SAFM treatment than with TBFM treatment. This significant difference was well maintained at two years post-treatment.