Login / Signup

The nature and magnitude of cognitive impairment in narcolepsy type 1, narcolepsy type 2, and idiopathic hypersomnia: a meta-analysis.

Brian T HarelJames J GattusoRobert D LatzmanPaul MaruffThomas E ScammellGiuseppe Plazzi
Published in: Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society (2024)
People with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1), narcolepsy type 2 (NT2), and idiopathic hypersomnia (IH) often report cognitive impairment which can be quite burdensome but is rarely evaluated in routine clinical practice. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed the nature and magnitude of cognitive impairment in NT1, NT2, and IH in studies conducted from January 2000 to October 2022. We classified cognitive tests assessing memory, executive function, and attention by cognitive domain. Between-group differences were analyzed as standardized mean differences (Cohen's d ), and Cohen's d for individual tests were integrated according to cognitive domain and clinical disease group. Eighty-seven studies were screened for inclusion; 39 satisfied inclusion criteria, yielding 73 comparisons ( k ): NT1, k  = 60; NT2, k  = 8; IH, k  = 5. Attention showed large impairment in people with NT1 ( d = -0.90) and IH ( d = -0.97), and moderate impairment in NT2 ( d = -0.60). Executive function was moderately impaired in NT1 ( d = -0.30) and NT2 ( d = -0.38), and memory showed small impairments in NT1 ( d = -0.33). A secondary meta-analysis identified sustained attention as the most impaired domain in NT1, NT2, and IH ( d ≈ -0.5 to -1). These meta-analyses confirm that cognitive impairments are present in NT1, NT2, and IH, and provide quantitative confirmation of reports of cognitive difficulties made by patients and clinicians. These findings provide a basis for the future design of studies to determine whether cognitive impairments can improve with pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments for narcolepsy and IH.
Keyphrases
  • cognitive impairment
  • systematic review
  • working memory
  • clinical practice
  • chronic kidney disease
  • end stage renal disease
  • case control
  • high resolution
  • prognostic factors
  • adverse drug