Venous thromboembolism in orthopaedic oncology.
Johnathan R LexScott EvansPaul CoolJonathan GregoryRobert U AshfordKenneth S RankinTom CoskerAmit KumarCraig GerrandJonathan Daniel Stevensonnull nullPublished in: The bone & joint journal (2020)
Current evidence is limited to guide clinicians. It is our consensus opinion, based upon logic and deduction, that all patients be considered for both mechanical and chemical VTE prophylaxis, particularly in high-risk patients (pelvic or hip resections, prosthetic reconstruction, malignant diagnosis, presence of metastases, or surgical procedures longer than three hours). Additionally, the surgeon must determine, in each patient, if the risk of haemorrhage outweighs the risk of VTE. No individual pharmacological agent has been identified as being superior in the prevention of VTE events. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(12)1743:-1751.