Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided PCI as Compared with Coronary Bypass Surgery.
William F FearonFrederik M ZimmermannBernard De BruyneZsolt PirothAlbert H M van StratenLaszlo SzekelyGiedrius DavidavičiusGintaras KalinauskasSamer MansourRajesh KharbandaNikolaos Östlund-PapadogeorgosAdel AminianKeith G OldroydNawwar Al-AttarNikola JagicJan-Henk E DambrinkPetr KalaOskar AngeråsPhilip MacCarthyOlaf WendlerFilip CasselmanNils WittKreton MavromatisSteven E S MinerJaydeep SarmaThomas EngstrømEvald H ChristiansenPim A L ToninoMichael J ReardonDi LuVictoria Y DingYuhei KobayashiMark A HlatkyKenneth W MahaffeyManisha DesaiY Joseph WooAlan C YeungNico H J Pijlsnull nullPublished in: The New England journal of medicine (2021)
In patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease, FFR-guided PCI was not found to be noninferior to CABG with respect to the incidence of a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization at 1 year. (Funded by Medtronic and Abbott Vascular; FAME 3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02100722.).
Keyphrases
- coronary artery disease
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- coronary artery bypass grafting
- coronary artery bypass
- st segment elevation myocardial infarction
- st elevation myocardial infarction
- acute myocardial infarction
- antiplatelet therapy
- cardiovascular events
- atrial fibrillation
- minimally invasive
- heart failure
- acute coronary syndrome
- risk factors
- left ventricular
- aortic stenosis
- type diabetes
- subarachnoid hemorrhage