Login / Signup

Auditory predator cues decrease herbivore survival and plant damage.

Zachary A LeeCaroline B CohenAlex K BaranowskiKristen N BerryMaxwell R McGuireTyler S PelletierBrendan P PeckJacqueline J BlundellEvan L Preisser
Published in: Ecology (2023)
The high fitness cost of predation selects for prey capable of detecting risk cues and responding in ways that reduce their vulnerability. While impacts of auditory predator cues have been extensively researched in vertebrate prey, much less is known about invertebrate species' responses and their potential to affect the wider foodweb. We exposed larvae of Spodoptera exigua, a slow-moving and vulnerable herbivore hunted by aerial predators, to recordings of wasp buzzing (risk cue), mosquito buzzing (no-risk cue), or a no-sound control in both lab and field settings. In the lab, wasp buzzing (but not mosquito buzzing) reduced survival relative to the control; there was, however, no effect on time to or weight at pupation in survivors. In the field, wasp buzzing reduced caterpillar herbivory and increased plant biomass relative to the control treatment. In contrast, mosquito buzzing reduced herbivory less than wasp buzzing and had no effect on plant biomass. The fact that wasp cues evoked strong responses in both experiments, while mosquito buzzing generally did not, indicates that caterpillars were responding to predation risk rather than sound per se. Such auditory cues may have an important but largely unappreciated impact on terrestrial invertebrate herbivores and their host plants.
Keyphrases