Login / Signup

Post-exposure Prophylaxis Awareness, Knowledge, Access and Use Among Three Populations in New York City, 2016-17.

Beryl A KoblinDaShawn UsherVijay NandiHong-Van TieuEddie BravoDebbie LucyLondon MilesGeneva OrtizMarcia J KindlonDonna M ParisiVictoria Frye
Published in: AIDS and behavior (2019)
Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is a cost-effective, but underused HIV prevention strategy. PEP awareness, knowledge, access, and usage was assessed among young men of color who have sex with men (YMSMOC; n = 177), transgender women (TW; n = 182), and cisgender women of color (CWOC; n = 170) in New York City. 59% were aware of PEP: 80% among YMSMOC, 63% among TW and 34% among CWOC (p < 0.001). 13% had ever used PEP. PEP awareness was higher among YMSMOC with a recent HIV test and lower among those with ≥ 4 partners. PEP awareness was lower among TW who anticipated stigma and reported barriers to taking PEP, and higher among TW who exchanged sex for resources. Among CWOC, more barriers to taking PEP reduced the odds of PEP awareness. PEP education and outreach needs to be deliberate about population-specific campaigns, with a need to focus on reducing PEP stigma and other barriers which impede PEP access.
Keyphrases
  • healthcare
  • polycystic ovary syndrome
  • hiv testing
  • adipose tissue
  • metabolic syndrome
  • pregnant women
  • antiretroviral therapy
  • pregnancy outcomes
  • men who have sex with men