Login / Signup

The concordance between RNA-seq and microarray data depends on chemical treatment and transcript abundance.

Charles WangBinsheng GongPierre R BushelJean Thierry-MiegDanielle Thierry-MiegJoshua XuHong FangHuixiao HongJie ShenZhenqiang SuJoe MeehanXiaojin LiLu YangHaiqing LiPaweł P ŁabajDavid P KreilDalila MegherbiStan GajFlorian CaimentJoost van DelftJos KleinjansAndreas SchererViswanath DevanarayanJian WangYong YangHui-Rong QianLee J LancashireMarina BessarabovaYuri NikolskyCesare FurlanelloMarco ChiericiDavide AlbaneseGiuseppe JurmanSamantha RiccadonnaMichele FilosiRoberto VisintainerKe K ZhangJianying LiJui-Hua HsiehDaniel L SvobodaJames C FuscoeYouping DengLeming ShiRichard S PaulesScott S AuerbachWeida Tong
Published in: Nature biotechnology (2014)
The concordance of RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) with microarrays for genome-wide analysis of differential gene expression has not been rigorously assessed using a range of chemical treatment conditions. Here we use a comprehensive study design to generate Illumina RNA-seq and Affymetrix microarray data from the same liver samples of rats exposed in triplicate to varying degrees of perturbation by 27 chemicals representing multiple modes of action (MOAs). The cross-platform concordance in terms of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) or enriched pathways is linearly correlated with treatment effect size (R(2)0.8). Furthermore, the concordance is also affected by transcript abundance and biological complexity of the MOA. RNA-seq outperforms microarray (93% versus 75%) in DEG verification as assessed by quantitative PCR, with the gain mainly due to its improved accuracy for low-abundance transcripts. Nonetheless, classifiers to predict MOAs perform similarly when developed using data from either platform. Therefore, the endpoint studied and its biological complexity, transcript abundance and the genomic application are important factors in transcriptomic research and for clinical and regulatory decision making.
Keyphrases