Login / Signup

Chatbots, generative AI, and scholarly manuscripts: WAME recommendations on chatbots and generative artificial intelligence in relation to scholarly publications.

Tilman RuffMargaret A WinkerRakesh AggarwalLorraine E FerrisFalko Markus HeinemannJosé Florencio F LapeñaSanjay A PaiEdsel B IngCitrome LeslieMurad AlamMichael VoightFarrokh Habibzadeh
Published in: Colombia medica (Cali, Colombia) (2023)
This statement revises our earlier "WAME Recommendations on ChatGPT and Chatbots in Relation to Scholarly Publications" (January 20, 2023). The revision reflects the proliferation of chatbots and their expanding use in scholarly publishing over the last few months, as well as emerging concerns regarding lack of authenticity of content when using chatbots. These recommendations are intended to inform editors and help them develop policies for the use of chatbots in papers published in their journals. They aim to help authors and reviewers understand how best to attribute the use of chatbots in their work and to address the need for all journal editors to have access to manuscript screening tools. In this rapidly evolving field, we will continue to modify these recommendations as the software and its applications develop.
Keyphrases
  • artificial intelligence
  • clinical practice
  • machine learning
  • big data
  • deep learning
  • public health
  • signaling pathway
  • total knee arthroplasty
  • systematic review