Login / Signup

Assessing the performance of methods for cell clustering from single-cell DNA sequencing data.

Rituparna KhanXian Fan Mallory
Published in: PLoS computational biology (2023)
From the benchmark study, we conclude that BnpC and SCG's clustering accuracy are the highest and comparable to each other. However, BnpC is more advantageous in terms of running time when cell number is high (> 1500). It also has a higher clustering accuracy than SCG when cluster number is high (> 16). SCClone's accuracy in estimating the number of clusters is the highest. RobustClone and SCITE's clustering accuracy are the lowest for all experiments. SCITE tends to over-estimate the cluster number and has a low specificity, whereas RobustClone tends to under-estimate the cluster number and has a much lower sensitivity than other methods. SBMClone produced reasonably good clustering (V-measure > 0.9) when coverage is > = 0.03 and thus is highly recommended for ultra-low coverage large scDNAseq data sets.
Keyphrases
  • single cell
  • rna seq
  • high throughput
  • electronic health record
  • healthcare
  • stem cells
  • machine learning
  • affordable care act
  • mesenchymal stem cells
  • mass spectrometry
  • bone marrow