Recent Administration of Iodinated Contrast Renders Core Infarct Estimation Inaccurate Using RAPID Software.
Alexander CopelanEric R SmithGerald T DroctonKazim H NarsinhD C MurphR S KhanguraZ J HartleyAdib A AblaWilliam P DillonChristopher F DowdRandall T HigashidaVan HalbachSteven W HettsDaniel L CookeKevin J KeenanJ NelsonDavid McCoyM CianoMatthew Robert AmansPublished in: AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology (2020)
Patients who received IV iodinated contrast in proximity (<8 hours) to CTA/CTP as part of a separate imaging study had a much higher likelihood of core infarct underestimation with RAPID compared with contrast-naïve patients. Over-reliance on RAPID postprocessing for treatment disposition of patients with extended window emergent large-vessel occlusion should be avoided, particularly with recent IV contrast administration.
Keyphrases
- magnetic resonance
- end stage renal disease
- contrast enhanced
- loop mediated isothermal amplification
- ejection fraction
- chronic kidney disease
- high resolution
- prognostic factors
- magnetic resonance imaging
- peritoneal dialysis
- heart failure
- mass spectrometry
- computed tomography
- patient reported outcomes
- atrial fibrillation
- data analysis
- smoking cessation