Optical coherence tomography versus angiography and intravascular ultrasound to guide coronary stent implantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Tariq Jamal SiddiqiMuhammad Shahzeb KhanKeyvan Karimi GalougahiEvan ShlofmitzJeffrey W MosesSunil RaoNick E J WestEric WolffJason HochlerKaren ChauOmar KhaliqueRichard A ShlofmitzAllen JeremiasZiad A AliPublished in: Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (2022)
OCT-guided PCI was associated with reduced all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared to angiography-guided PCI. These results should be considered hypothesis generating as the mechanisms for the improved outcomes were unclear as no differences were detected in the rates of TLR, TVR, or ST. OCT- and IVUS-guided PCI resulted in similar post-PCI outcomes.
Keyphrases
- optical coherence tomography
- coronary artery disease
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- acute myocardial infarction
- acute coronary syndrome
- antiplatelet therapy
- st elevation myocardial infarction
- st segment elevation myocardial infarction
- diabetic retinopathy
- cardiovascular events
- atrial fibrillation
- optic nerve
- coronary artery bypass grafting
- coronary artery
- immune response
- computed tomography
- inflammatory response
- toll like receptor
- heart failure
- skeletal muscle
- left ventricular
- metabolic syndrome
- adipose tissue
- weight loss
- transcatheter aortic valve replacement