Fully Automated Deep Learning Model to Detect Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer at MRI.
Jason C CaiHirotsugu NakaiShiba P KuanarAdam T FroemmingCandice W BolanAkira KawashimaHiroaki TakahashiLance A MynderseChandler D DoraMitchell R HumphreysPanagiotis KorffiatisPouria RouzrokhAlexander K BrattGian Marco ConteBradley J EricksonNaoki TakahashiPublished in: Radiology (2024)
Background Multiparametric MRI can help identify clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (Gleason score ≥7) but is limited by reader experience and interobserver variability. In contrast, deep learning (DL) produces deterministic outputs. Purpose To develop a DL model to predict the presence of csPCa by using patient-level labels without information about tumor location and to compare its performance with that of radiologists. Materials and Methods Data from patients without known csPCa who underwent MRI from January 2017 to December 2019 at one of multiple sites of a single academic institution were retrospectively reviewed. A convolutional neural network was trained to predict csPCa from T2-weighted images, diffusion-weighted images, apparent diffusion coefficient maps, and T1-weighted contrast-enhanced images. The reference standard was pathologic diagnosis. Radiologist performance was evaluated as follows: Radiology reports were used for the internal test set, and four radiologists' PI-RADS ratings were used for the external (ProstateX) test set. The performance was compared using areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) and the DeLong test. Gradient-weighted class activation maps (Grad-CAMs) were used to show tumor localization. Results Among 5735 examinations in 5215 patients (mean age, 66 years ± 8 [SD]; all male), 1514 examinations (1454 patients) showed csPCa. In the internal test set (400 examinations), the AUC was 0.89 and 0.89 for the DL classifier and radiologists, respectively ( P = .88). In the external test set (204 examinations), the AUC was 0.86 and 0.84 for the DL classifier and radiologists, respectively ( P = .68). DL classifier plus radiologists had an AUC of 0.89 ( P < .001). Grad-CAMs demonstrated activation over the csPCa lesion in 35 of 38 and 56 of 58 true-positive examinations in internal and external test sets, respectively. Conclusion The performance of a DL model was not different from that of radiologists in the detection of csPCa at MRI, and Grad-CAMs localized the tumor. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Johnson and Chandarana in this issue.
Keyphrases
- contrast enhanced
- deep learning
- diffusion weighted
- artificial intelligence
- prostate cancer
- magnetic resonance imaging
- convolutional neural network
- diffusion weighted imaging
- magnetic resonance
- end stage renal disease
- computed tomography
- ejection fraction
- chronic kidney disease
- radical prostatectomy
- machine learning
- peritoneal dialysis
- emergency department
- prognostic factors
- patient reported outcomes
- high throughput
- optical coherence tomography
- social media
- high intensity
- real time pcr