Overestimation of the Ischemic Core Is Associated With Higher Core Lesion Volume and Degree of Reperfusion After Thrombectomy.
Gabriel BroocksLukas MeyerLaurens WinkelmeierHelge C KniepChristian HeitkampSøren ChristensenMaarten G LansbergChristian ThalerAndré KemmlingGerhard SchönKamil ZeleňákChristian-Paul StrackeGregory W AlbersFiehler JensMax WintermarkJeremy J HeitTobias Djamsched FaizyPublished in: Radiology (2024)
Background CT perfusion (CTP)-derived baseline ischemic core volume (ICV) can overestimate the true extent of infarction, which may result in exclusion of patients with ischemic stroke from endovascular treatment (EVT). Purpose To determine whether ischemic core overestimation is associated with larger ICV and degree of recanalization. Materials and Methods This retrospective multicenter cohort study included patients with acute ischemic stroke triaged at multimodal CT who underwent EVT between January 2015 and January 2022. The primary outcome was ischemic core overestimation, which was assumed when baseline CTP-derived ICV was larger than the final infarct volume at follow-up imaging. The secondary outcome was functional independence defined as modified Rankin Scale scores of 0-2 90 days after EVT. Successful vessel recanalization was defined as extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b or higher. Categorical variables were compared between patients with ICV of 50 mL or less versus large ICV greater than 50 mL with use of the χ 2 test. Adjusted multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess the primary and secondary outcomes. Results In total, 721 patients (median age, 76 years [IQR, 64-83 years]; 371 female) were included, of which 162 (22%) demonstrated ischemic core overestimation. Core overestimation occurred more often in patients with ICV greater than 50 mL versus 50 mL or less (48% vs 16%; P < .001) and those with successful versus unsuccessful vessel recanalization (26% vs 13%; P < .001). In an adjusted model, successful recanalization after EVT (odds ratio [OR], 3.14 [95% CI: 1.65, 5.95]; P < .001) and larger ICV (OR, 1.03 [95% CI: 1.02, 1.04]; P < .001) were independently associated with core overestimation, while the time from symptom onset to imaging showed no association (OR, 0.99; P = .96). Core overestimation was independently associated with functional independence (adjusted OR, 2.83 [95% CI: 1.66, 4.81]; P < .001) after successful recanalization. Conclusion Ischemic core overestimation occurred more frequently in patients presenting with large CTP-derived ICV and successful vessel recanalization compared with those with unsuccessful recanalization. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.
Keyphrases
- endovascular treatment
- acute ischemic stroke
- middle cerebral artery
- cerebral ischemia
- high resolution
- magnetic resonance imaging
- heart failure
- end stage renal disease
- contrast enhanced
- magnetic resonance
- metabolic syndrome
- chronic kidney disease
- positron emission tomography
- clinical trial
- blood brain barrier
- oxidative stress
- insulin resistance
- left ventricular
- prognostic factors
- image quality
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- double blind
- weight loss
- peritoneal dialysis
- patient reported outcomes
- glycemic control