Login / Signup

An Ethics and Social-Justice Approach to Collecting and Using Demographic Data for Psychological Researchers.

Christine C CallKristen L EckstrandSteven W KasparekCassandra L BonessLorraine R BlattNabila Jamal-OrozcoDerek M NovacekDan Fotinull null
Published in: Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science (2022)
The collection and use of demographic data in psychological sciences has the potential to aid in transforming inequities brought about by unjust social conditions toward equity. However, many current methods surrounding demographic data do not achieve this goal. Some methods function to reduce, but not eliminate, inequities, whereas others may perpetuate harmful stereotypes, invalidate minoritized identities, and exclude key groups from research participation or access to disseminated findings. In this article, we aim to (a) review key ethical and social-justice dilemmas inherent to working with demographic data in psychological research and (b) introduce a framework positioned in ethics and social justice to help psychologists and researchers in social-science fields make thoughtful decisions about the collection and use of demographic data. Although demographic data methods vary across subdisciplines and research topics, we assert that these core issues-and solutions-are relevant to all research within the psychological sciences, including basic and applied research. Our overarching aim is to support key stakeholders in psychology (e.g., researchers, funding agencies, journal editors, peer reviewers) in making ethical and socially-just decisions about the collection, analysis, reporting, interpretation, and dissemination of demographic data.
Keyphrases
  • big data
  • electronic health record
  • healthcare
  • mental health
  • public health
  • data analysis
  • machine learning
  • mental illness
  • emergency department
  • physical activity
  • climate change
  • artificial intelligence
  • sleep quality