Login / Signup

A cost-utility analysis comparing CT surveillance, PET-CT surveillance, and planned postradiation neck dissection for advanced nodal HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer.

Terence S FuPatrick SchefflerDavid FornerChristopher W NoelShao Hui HuangRalph W GilbertDavid P GoldsteinBrian O'SullivanHisham M MehannaJohn WaldronJohn R De Almeida
Published in: Cancer (2021)
Image-guided surveillance including PET-CT and CT are more cost effective than PRND. The novel PET-CT approach with repeat PET for equivocal responders was the dominant strategy and yielded both higher benefit and lower costs compared with standard PET-CT surveillance.
Keyphrases