Login / Signup

Reducing attrition within clinical trials: The communication of retention and withdrawal within patient information leaflets.

Anna KearneyAnna Rosala-HallasNaomi BaconAnne DaykinAlison R G ShawAthene J LaneJane M BlazebyMike ClarkePaula R WilliamsonCarrol Gamble
Published in: PloS one (2018)
Withdrawal and retention is poorly described within PIL and addressing this might positively impact levels of patient attrition, reducing missing data. Consent information is unbalanced, focussing on patient's rights to withdraw without accompanying information that promotes robust consent and sustained participation. With many citing altruistic reasons for participation it is essential that PIL include more information on retention and clarify withdrawal terminology so patients are aware of how they can make a valuable contribution to clinical studies. There is a need to determine how retention can be described to patients to avoid concerns of coercion. Future research is needed to explore whether the absence of information about retention at the time of consent is impacting attrition.
Keyphrases
  • end stage renal disease
  • clinical trial
  • ejection fraction
  • health information
  • chronic kidney disease
  • case report
  • healthcare
  • patient reported outcomes
  • big data
  • artificial intelligence
  • patient reported