Login / Signup

Impact of polypharmacy and comorbidity on survival and systemic parenteral treatment administration in a cohort of hospitalized lung-cancer patients.

Hélène PluchartSébastien BaillySébastien ChanoineDenis Moro-SibilotPierrick BedouchAnne-Claire Toffart
Published in: BMC cancer (2023)
In total, 633 patients were included (71% men), with a median age of 66 years. The median Elixhauser score was 6 and median overall survival was four months. Among the patients, 24.3% were considered to be receiving polypharmacy, with a median number of medications of 3, and 49.9% received systemic parenteral treatment within two months after hospitalization. Severe comorbidity (Elixhauser score > 11), but not polypharmacy, was independently associated with a lower rate of systemic parenteral treatment prescription (SdHR = 0.4 [0.3;0.6], p < 0.01) and polypharmacy, but not a high comorbidity score, was independently associated with poorer four-month survival (HR = 1.4 [1.1;1.9], p < 0.01) CONCLUSIONS: This first study to evaluate the consequences of comorbidity and polypharmacy on the care of lung-cancer patients shows that a high comorbidity burden can delay systemic parenteral treatment administration, whereas polypharmacy has a negative impact on four-month survival.
Keyphrases
  • healthcare
  • newly diagnosed
  • ejection fraction
  • palliative care
  • combination therapy
  • prognostic factors
  • replacement therapy
  • middle aged
  • patient reported
  • pain management