Is active surveillance an appropriate approach to manage prostate cancer patients with Gleason Score 3+3 who met the criteria for active surveillance?
Saleh GhiasyAmir Reza AbediAfshin MoradiSeyed Yousef HosseiniMorteza Fallah KarkanGhazal SadriMohammadreza DavariPublished in: Turkish journal of urology (2018)
We suggest that some patients with Gleason Score 3+3 have tumor volume >0.5 cm3 who are considered having significant cancer pathology and active surveillance may not be appropriate approach to manage all cases with Gleason Score 3+3.