Complete vs. Culprit-Only Revascularization in Older Patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Individual Patient Meta-Analysis.
Gianluca Calogero CampoFelix BöhmThomas EngstrømPieter C SmitsAkram Y ElgendyGerry P McCannDavid A WoodMatteo SerenelliStefan K JamesDan Eik HøfstenBianca Boxma-de KlerkAdrian Paul BanningJohn A CairnsRita PavasiniGoran StankovicPetr KalaHenning KelbækEmanuele BarbatoIlija SrdanovićMohamed HamzaAmerjeet S BanningSimone BiscagliaShamir R MehtaPublished in: Circulation (2024)
Background: Complete revascularization is the standard treatment for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease. The Functional Assessment in Elderly MI Patients with Multivessel Disease (FIRE) trial confirmed the benefit of complete revascularization in a population of older patients, but the follow-up is limited to 1 year. Therefore, the long-term benefit ( > 1-year) of this strategy in older patients is debated. To address this, an individual patient data meta-analysis was conducted in STEMI patients aged 75 years or older enrolled in randomized clinical trials investigating complete vs. culprit-only revascularization strategies. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database, were systematically searched to identify randomized clinical trials comparing complete vs. culprit-only revascularization. Individual patient-level data were collected from the relevant trials. The primary endpoint was death, myocardial infarction (MI), or ischemia-driven revascularization. The secondary endpoint was cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction. Results: Data from seven RCTs, encompassing 1733 patients (917 randomized to culprit-only and 816 to complete revascularization), were analyzed. The median age was 79 [77-83] years. Females were 595 (34%). Follow-up ranged from a minimum of six months to a maximum of 6.2 years (median 2.5 [1-3.8] years). Complete revascularization reduced the primary endpoint up to four years (HR 0.78, 95%CI 0.63-0.96), but not at the longest available follow-up (HR 0.83, 95%CI 0.69-1.01). Complete revascularization significantly reduced the occurrence of cardiovascular death or MI at the longest available follow-up (HR 0.76, 95%CI 0.58-0.99). This was observed even when censoring the follow-up at each year. Long-term rate of death did not differ between complete and culprit-only revascularization arms. Conclusions: In this individual patient data meta-analysis of older STEMI patients with multivessel disease, complete revascularization reduced the primary endpoint of death, MI or ischemia-driven revascularization up to 4-year. At the longest follow-up, complete revascularization reduced the composite of cardiovascular death or MI, but not the primary endpoint. Clinical Study Registration: PROSPERO CRD42022367898.
Keyphrases
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- st segment elevation myocardial infarction
- coronary artery bypass grafting
- st elevation myocardial infarction
- acute coronary syndrome
- coronary artery disease
- systematic review
- coronary artery bypass
- atrial fibrillation
- end stage renal disease
- heart failure
- case report
- clinical trial
- chronic kidney disease
- double blind
- open label
- prognostic factors
- left ventricular
- newly diagnosed
- big data
- emergency department
- community dwelling
- phase iii
- patient reported outcomes
- study protocol
- phase ii
- peritoneal dialysis
- combination therapy
- placebo controlled
- deep learning