EXPRESS: Examining the Effect of Expected Test Format and Test Difficulty on the Frequency and Mnemonic Costs of Mind Wandering.

Mind wandering, generally defined as task unrelated thought, has been shown to constitute between 30 and 50% of individuals' thoughts during almost every activity in which they are engaged. Critically however, previous research has shown that the demands of a given task can lead to either the up- or down-regulation of mind wandering, and that engagement in mind wandering may be differentially detrimental to future memory performance depending on learning conditions. The goal of the current research was to gain a better understanding of how the circumstances surrounding a learning episode affect the frequency with which individuals engage in off-task thought, and the extent to which these differences differentially impact memory performance across different test formats. Specifically, while prior work has manipulated the conditions of encoding, we focused on the anticipated characteristics of the retrieval task, thereby examining whether the anticipation of later demands imposed by expected test format/difficulty would influence the frequency or performance costs of mind wandering during encoding. Across three experiments we demonstrate that the anticipation of future test demands, as modeled by expected test format/difficulty, does not impact rates of mind wandering. However, the costs associated with mind wandering do appear to scale with the difficulty of the test. These findings provide important new insights on the impact of off-task thought on future memory performance, and constrain our understanding of the strategic regulation of inattention in the context of learning and memory.