Error-Correction Method for High-Throughput Sizing of Nanoscale Vesicles with Single-Molecule Localization Microscopy.

Single-molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) allows super-resolution imaging, mapping, counting, and sizing of biological nanostructures such as cell organelles and extracellular vesicles (EVs), but sizing structures smaller than ∼100 nm can be inaccurate due to single-molecule localization error caused by distortion of the point spread function and limited photon number. Here we demonstrate a method to correct localization error when sizing vesicles and other spherical nanoparticles with SMLM and compare sizing results using two vesicle labeling schemes. We use mean approximation theory to derive a simple equation using full width at half-maximum (FWHM) for correcting particle sizes measured by two-dimensional SMLM, validate the method by sizing streptavidin-coated polystyrene nanobeads with the SMLM technique d STORM with and without error correction, using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) for comparison, and then apply the method to sizing small seminal EVs. Nanobead sizes measured by d STORM became increasingly less accurate (larger than TEM values) for beads smaller than 50 nm. The error-correction method reduced the size difference versus TEM from 15% without error correction to 7% with error correction for 40 nm beads, from 44% to 9% for 30 nm beads, and from 66% to 15% for 20 nm beads. Seminal EVs were labeled with a lipophilic membrane dye (MemBright 700) and with an Alexa Fluor 488-anti-CD63 antibody conjugate, and were sized separately using both dyes by d STORM. Error-corrected exosome diameters were smaller than uncorrected values: 72 nm vs 79 nm mean diameter with membrane dyes; 84 nm vs 97 nm with the antibody-conjugated dyes. The mean error-corrected diameter was 12 nm smaller when using the membrane dye than when using the antibody-conjugated dye likely due to the large size of the antibody. Thus, both the error-correction method and the compact membrane labeling scheme reduce overestimation of vesicle size by SMLM. This error-correction method has a low computational cost as it does not require correction of individual blinking events, and it is compatible with all SMLM techniques (e.g., PALM, STORM, and DNA-PAINT).