Preferences and perceptions of 617 migraine patients on acute and preventive migraine treatment attributes and clinical trial endpoints.
Michail VikelisDimitrios RikosHaralabos P KalofonosPinelopi PapachristouDimitrios RallisTheodoros KarapanayiotidesAndreas GalanopoulosKonstantinos SpingosNikolaos DimisianosEmmanouil GiakoumakisPeriklis ZavridisKonstantinos NotasGeorge S VlachosPanagiotis SoldatosKonstantinos BiliasGeorgia XiromerisiouJobst RudolfEmmanouil V DermitzakisAlan M RapoportPublished in: Expert review of neurotherapeutics (2024)
Questionnaires were collected from 617 migraine patients. Efficacy was preferred over safety as the single most important parameter, both in acute and preventive treatment. When analyzing single outcomes, patients prioritized a complete pain remission at 1-hour post-dose for acute therapies. Regarding migraine prevention, a 75% reduction in frequency, intensity of pain, accompanying symptoms and acute medication intake were considered as most important. Conversely, outcomes routinely used in clinical trials, namely complete or partial pain remission at 2-hours post-dose for acute treatment and 50% or 30% reduction in migraine frequency for prevention, were not deemed particularly relevant. Tablet formulation was mostly preferred, both in acute and preventive treatment. Conclusion: Listening to patients' needs may add a piece of the puzzle that is generally missing in clinical practice and often explains the lack of adherence in both acute and preventative anti-migraine therapies.
Keyphrases
- clinical trial
- liver failure
- end stage renal disease
- chronic kidney disease
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- healthcare
- chronic pain
- peritoneal dialysis
- drug induced
- prognostic factors
- clinical practice
- primary care
- neuropathic pain
- physical activity
- spinal cord injury
- skeletal muscle
- aortic dissection
- spinal cord
- open label
- combination therapy
- double blind