A Tool to Estimate Risk of 30-day Mortality and Complications After Hip Fracture Surgery: Accurate Enough for Some but Not All Purposes? A Study From the ACS-NSQIP Database.
Alex H S HarrisAmber W TrickeyHyrum S EddingtonCarolyn D SeibRobin N KamalAlfred C KuoQian DingNicholas J GioriPublished in: Clinical orthopaedics and related research (2022)
The models of mortality and complications we developed may be accurate enough for some uses, especially personalizing informed consent and shared decision-making with patient-specific risk estimates. However, the high false discovery rate suggests the models should not be used to restrict access to surgery for high-risk patients. Deciding which measures of accuracy to prioritize and what is "accurate enough" depends on the clinical question and use of the predictions. Discrimination and calibration are commonly used measures of overall model accuracy but may be poorly suited to certain clinical questions and applications. Clinically, overall accuracy may not be as important as knowing how accurate and useful specific values of predicted risk are for specific purposes.Level of Evidence Level III, therapeutic study.
Keyphrases
- hip fracture
- minimally invasive
- high resolution
- coronary artery bypass
- end stage renal disease
- risk factors
- cardiovascular events
- newly diagnosed
- ejection fraction
- small molecule
- peritoneal dialysis
- prognostic factors
- surgical site infection
- cardiovascular disease
- quality improvement
- coronary artery disease
- electronic health record
- patient reported
- low cost