Comparative safety review of antithrombotic treatment options for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Muhammed Ibrahim ErbayNikolaos PyrpyrisShriraj SusarlaSebahat UlusanAdriana C MaresTasha Phillips WilsonDuo LeeAayushi SoodRahul GuptaPublished in: Expert opinion on drug safety (2024)
The evolving evidence supports double antithrombotic therapy (DAT) over triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) for these patients, showcasing a more favorable safety profile without compromising efficacy. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC)-based DAT strategies exhibit superiority in reducing major bleeding events while effectively preventing ischemic events. Recommendations from the 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines advocate for NOAC-based DAT post-PCI, endorsing safer antithrombotic profiles.Challenges persist for specific patient categories requiring both oral anticoagulants and antiplatelets, necessitating personalized approaches. Future advances in intravascular imaging and novel coronary stent technologies offer promising avenues to optimize outcomes and influence antithrombotic strategies in AF-PCI patients.
Keyphrases
- atrial fibrillation
- oral anticoagulants
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- end stage renal disease
- coronary artery disease
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- chronic kidney disease
- acute myocardial infarction
- heart failure
- acute coronary syndrome
- st segment elevation myocardial infarction
- coronary artery
- prognostic factors
- antiplatelet therapy
- st elevation myocardial infarction
- stem cells
- coronary artery bypass grafting
- metabolic syndrome
- high resolution
- mesenchymal stem cells
- oxidative stress
- patient reported outcomes
- photodynamic therapy
- bone marrow
- case report
- cell therapy
- current status
- insulin resistance
- weight loss