Bias in natriuretic peptide-guided heart failure trials: time to improve guideline adherence using alternative approaches.
Susan StienenAnkeet BhattJoão Pedro FerreiraMuthiah VaduganathanJames JanuzziKirkwood AdamsJean-Claude TardifPatrick RossignolFaiez ZannadPublished in: Heart failure reviews (2021)
Treatment of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with currently available therapies reduces morbidity and mortality. However, implementation of these therapies is a problem with only few patients achieving guideline-recommended maximal doses of therapy. In an effort to improve guideline adherence and uptitration, several trials have investigated a biomarker-guided strategy (using natriuretic peptide targets in specific), but although conceptually promising, these trials failed to show a consistent beneficial effect on outcomes. In this review, we discuss different methodological issues that may explain the failure of these trials and offer potential solutions. Moreover, alternative approaches to increase heart failure guideline adherence are evaluated.
Keyphrases
- heart failure
- end stage renal disease
- newly diagnosed
- healthcare
- left ventricular
- ejection fraction
- glycemic control
- primary care
- atrial fibrillation
- stem cells
- prognostic factors
- peritoneal dialysis
- bone marrow
- blood pressure
- high resolution
- patient reported outcomes
- skeletal muscle
- body composition
- mesenchymal stem cells
- insulin resistance
- replacement therapy
- atomic force microscopy