Paranormal beliefs and cognitive function: A systematic review and assessment of study quality across four decades of research.
Charlotte E DeanShazia AkhtarTim M GaleKaren IrvineDominique GrohmannKeith R LawsPublished in: PloS one (2022)
Although study quality is good, areas of methodological weakness exist. In addressing these methodological issues, we propose that authors engage with preregistration of data collection and analysis procedures. At a conceptual level, we argue poorer cognitive performance across seemingly disparate cognitive domains might reflect the influence of an over-arching executive dysfunction.