Login / Signup

Evidence use in decision-making on introducing innovations: a systematic scoping review with stakeholder feedback.

Simon TurnerDanielle D'LimaEmma HudsonStephen MorrisJessica SheringhamNick SwartNaomi J Fulop
Published in: Implementation science : IS (2017)
The synthesis of results from primary qualitative studies found that evidence use in decision-making on innovation is influenced by processes at multiple levels. Interactions between different levels shape evidence use in decision-making (e.g. professional groups and organisations can use local systems to validate evidence and legitimise innovations, while local systems can tailor or frame evidence to influence activity at lower levels). Organisational leaders need to consider whether the environment in which decisions are made values diverse evidence and stakeholder perspectives. Further qualitative research on decision-making practices that highlights how and why different types of evidence come to count during decisions, and tracks the political aspects of decisions about innovation, is needed.
Keyphrases
  • decision making
  • healthcare
  • primary care
  • systematic review