Reproductive materialism and justice for women with abortion care needs in Uganda.
Alexander KagahaLenore MandersonPublished in: Global public health (2022)
While reproductive health justice is often assumed to be inherent in reproductive health interventions, the nature of injustices, and the reasons for and mechanisms of concealment, are often unclear. In this article, we draw on an ethnography of priority setting and healthcare practice in eastern Uganda to illuminate these injustices and the mechanisms of concealement. We focus on discursive practices as the mechanisms through which power is activated and navigated, such that health practitioners are able to evade state surveillance and retribution. While language discourses conceal and normalise reproductive health injustices, discursive practices of care and priority setting enable reproductive controls to be navigated in ways that amplify these injustices and create new ones. In interventions, precarious conditions that impact women's reproductive health and living circumstances are often overlooked or concealed. We illustrate the convergence of biopower and necropolitical strategies to illuminate these conditions. Using the concept of reproductive materialism, we show how neoliberalism cultivates particular conditions of everyday life, in which populations are positioned as instruments for pecuniary motives, and normative controls are used to further financial gain.
Keyphrases
- healthcare
- primary care
- public health
- physical activity
- affordable care act
- quality improvement
- autism spectrum disorder
- palliative care
- polycystic ovary syndrome
- south africa
- mental health
- mental illness
- type diabetes
- metabolic syndrome
- general practice
- young adults
- insulin resistance
- social media
- cervical cancer screening
- breast cancer risk