Login / Signup

Pitfalls in studies of eosinopenia and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte count ratio.

Stamatis KarakonstantisDimitra KalemakiEmmanouil TzagkarakisCharalampos Lydakis
Published in: Infectious diseases (London, England) (2017)
There is a number of publications evaluating the eosinophil count and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte count ratio for diagnosis, prognosis or monitoring of patients. Of special interest is the use of these parameters for discrimination between the different causes of fever (e.g. bacterial versus viral vs. non-infectious causes of fever) and for monitoring the efficacy of therapy and predict the course of the patient. However, pitfalls in previous study designs prevent applicability to clinical practice. Here, we provide a short review of the relevant literature and summarize important factors that should be taken into account when designing studies, with special attention to the selection of a proper and clinically meaningful study population and the effects of the stress response and of corticosteroids.
Keyphrases
  • peripheral blood
  • clinical practice
  • end stage renal disease
  • systematic review
  • newly diagnosed
  • sars cov
  • ejection fraction
  • prognostic factors
  • case report
  • mesenchymal stem cells
  • finite element analysis