Impact of the Film Array Meningitis/Encephalitis panel in adults with meningitis and encephalitis in Colombia.
Karen Melissa Ordóñez DíazJohn Alexander Alzate PiedrahítaOscar Felipe Suárez BrocheroDaniel Orozco GranadaLaura Marcela BarónIsabella Cortés BonillaRodrigo HasbunPublished in: Epidemiology and infection (2020)
The Biofire® Film Array Meningitis Encephalitis (FAME) panel can rapidly diagnose common aetiologies but its impact in Colombia is unknown. A retrospective study of adults with CNS infections in one tertiary hospital in Colombia. The cohort was divided into two time periods: before and after the implementation of the Biofire® FAME panel in May 2016. A total of 98 patients were enrolled, 52 and 46 were enrolled in the Standard of Care (SOC) group and in the FAME group, respectively. The most common comorbidity was human immunodeficiency virus infection (47.4%). The median time to a change in therapy was significantly shorter in the FAME group than in the SOC group (3 vs. 137.3 h, P < 0.001). This difference was driven by the timing to appropriate therapy (2.1 vs. 195 h, P < 0.001) by identifying viral aetiologies. Overall outcomes and length of stay were no different between both groups (P > 0.2). The FAME panel detected six aetiologies that had negative cultures but missed identifying one patient with Cryptococcus neoformans. The introduction of the Biofire FAME panel in Colombia has facilitated the identification of viral pathogens and has significantly reduced the time to the adjustment of empirical antimicrobial therapy.
Keyphrases
- healthcare
- sars cov
- endothelial cells
- cerebrospinal fluid
- primary care
- end stage renal disease
- high resolution
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- high throughput
- staphylococcus aureus
- stem cells
- case report
- reduced graphene oxide
- prognostic factors
- adipose tissue
- insulin resistance
- bone marrow
- mass spectrometry
- pain management
- chronic pain
- cell therapy
- high density
- single cell
- affordable care act