Restoring rotational stability following anterior cruciate ligament surgery: single-bundle reconstruction combined with lateral extra-articular tenodesis versus double-bundle reconstruction.
Claudio LegnaniEnrico BorgoVittorio MacchiAlberto VenturaPublished in: Journal of comparative effectiveness research (2022)
Aim: To compare the outcomes of patients who underwent single-bundle (SB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction combined with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) with the outcomes of those who underwent double-bundle (DB) ACL reconstruction. Methods: 16 patients who underwent ACL hamstring SB reconstruction combined with LET (Coker-Arnold modification of the MacIntosh procedure) were retrospectively compared with 20 patients who underwent hamstring DB reconstruction at an average follow-up of 6.2 years. Assessment included Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee scores, objective examination and instrumented laxity test. Results: No complications were reported. Mean Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee scores significantly increased from preoperatively (p < 0.05). No differences were reported between the two groups with regard to point scales, anterior tibial translation and pivot-shift test (p = not significant). Conclusions: Both DB ACL reconstruction and combined LET and autologous hamstring SB ACL reconstruction are effective at providing satisfying functional outcomes and restoring rotational stability.
Keyphrases
- anterior cruciate ligament
- end stage renal disease
- anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
- ejection fraction
- chronic kidney disease
- minimally invasive
- newly diagnosed
- total knee arthroplasty
- prognostic factors
- peritoneal dialysis
- type diabetes
- skeletal muscle
- adipose tissue
- metabolic syndrome
- bone marrow
- stem cells
- atrial fibrillation
- weight loss
- clinical evaluation