Rapid antigen and antibody microfluidic immunofluorescence assays compared to culture, PCR, and laboratory reference tests: Performance in a longitudinal cohort.
Ronit R DalmatLinhui HaoRoshni PrabhuElena RechkinaDaphne HamiltonMatthew H IkumaMarie BauerMichael GaleJason L CanteraAlexey S BallBenjamin D GrantPaul K DrainPublished in: The Journal of infectious diseases (2023)
We evaluated the performance of rapid antigen (RAg) and antibody (RAb) microfluidic diagnostics with serial sampling of 71 participants at six visits over two months following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Rapid tests showed strong agreement with laboratory references (KAg = 81.0%; KAb = 87.8%). RAg showed substantial concordance to both virus growth in culture and PCR-positivity 0-5 days since symptom onset (KAg-culture = 60.1% and KAg-PCR = 87.1%). PCR concordance to virus growth in culture was similar (KPCR-culture = 70.0%), though agreement between RAg and culture was better overall (KAg-culture = 45.5% vs. KPCR-culture = 10.0%). Rapid antigen and antibody testing by microfluidic immunofluorescence platform are highly accurate for characterization of acute infection.