Login / Signup

Effects of different surgical techniques and displacement distances on the soft tissue profile via orthodontic-orthognathic treatment of class II and class III malocclusions.

Stephan Christian MöhlhenrichFlorian KötterFlorian PetersKristian KnihaSachin ChhatwaniGholamreza DaneshFrank HölzleAli Modabber
Published in: Head & face medicine (2021)
When surgery is required, the influence of orthognathic surgical techniques on the profile seems to be less significant. However, it must be carefully considered if orthognathic or camouflage treatment should be done in moderate malocclusions as a moderate mandibular advancement in Class II therapy will straighten the soft tissue profile much more by increasing the facial and soft tissue profile angle and reducing the mentolabial angle than camouflage treatment. In contrast, moderate maxillary advancement in Class III therapy led to a significantly more convex facial and soft tissue profile by decreasing distances of the lips to the E-Line as well as the lower lip length.
Keyphrases
  • soft tissue
  • high intensity
  • high resolution
  • magnetic resonance
  • minimally invasive
  • coronary artery disease
  • mesenchymal stem cells
  • atrial fibrillation
  • contrast enhanced