Standards and Ethics Issues in the Determination of Death: A Position Paper From the American College of Physicians.
Matthew DeCampKenneth Pragernull nullPublished in: Annals of internal medicine (2023)
The determination of a patient's death is of considerable medical and ethical significance. Death is a biological concept with social implications. Acting with honesty, transparency, respect, and integrity is critical to trust in the patient-physician relationship, and the profession, in life and in death. Over time, cases about the determination of death have raised questions that need to be addressed. This American College of Physicians position paper addresses current controversies and supports a clarification to the Uniform Determination of Death Act; maintaining the 2 current independent standards of determining death, cardiorespiratory and neurologic; retaining the whole brain death standard; aligning medical testing with the standards; keeping issues about the determination of death separate from organ transplantation; reaffirming the importance and role of the dead donor rule; and engaging in educational efforts for health professionals, patients, and the public on these issues. Physicians should advocate for policies and practices on the determination of death that are consistent with the profession's fundamental and timeless commitment to individual patients and the public.
Keyphrases
- healthcare
- primary care
- solid phase extraction
- public health
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- molecularly imprinted
- mental health
- stem cells
- machine learning
- prognostic factors
- high resolution
- body composition
- case report
- white matter
- multiple sclerosis
- bone marrow
- artificial intelligence
- functional connectivity
- social media
- resting state
- decision making
- tandem mass spectrometry