Cost-utility analysis of sutureless and rapid deployment versus conventional aortic valve replacement in patients with moderate to severe aortic stenosis in Thailand.
Unchalee PermsuwanSeri SinghatanadgigeKawinnooch BoonpipattanapongWorawong SlisatkornAngsu ChartrungsanPrompak NitayavardhanaNutthawadee LuangthongPramote PorapakkhamJirawit YadeePublished in: PloS one (2024)
SUAVR treatment is not a cost-effective treatment strategy compared with CAVR treatment for patients with moderate-severe AS in Thailand, as it leads to higher costs and inferior health outcomes. Other important issues related to specific patients such as those with minimally invasive surgery, those undergoing AVR with concomitant procedures, and those with calcified and small aortic root should be taken into account.
Keyphrases
- aortic valve replacement
- aortic stenosis
- ejection fraction
- aortic valve
- transcatheter aortic valve implantation
- transcatheter aortic valve replacement
- left ventricular
- end stage renal disease
- high intensity
- coronary artery disease
- combination therapy
- coronary artery
- peritoneal dialysis
- pulmonary hypertension
- patient reported