Comparative safety review of antithrombotic treatment options for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Muhammed Ibrahim ErbayNikolaos PyrpyrisShriraj SusarlaSebahat UlusanAdriana C MaresTasha Phillips WilsonDuo LeeAayushi SoodRahul GuptaPublished in: Expert opinion on drug safety (2024)
The evolving evidence supports double antithrombotic therapy (DAT) over triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) for these patients, showcasing a more favorable safety profile without compromising efficacy. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC)-based DAT strategies exhibit superiority in reducing major bleeding events while effectively preventing ischemic events. Recommendations from the 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines advocate for NOAC-based DAT post-PCI, endorsing safer antithrombotic profiles.Challenges persist for specific patient categories requiring both oral anticoagulants and antiplatelets, necessitating personalized approaches. Future advances in intravascular imaging and novel coronary stent technologies offer promising avenues to optimize outcomes and influence antithrombotic strategies in AF-PCI patients.
Keyphrases
- atrial fibrillation
- oral anticoagulants
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- coronary artery disease
- end stage renal disease
- newly diagnosed
- acute myocardial infarction
- heart failure
- st segment elevation myocardial infarction
- acute coronary syndrome
- chronic kidney disease
- coronary artery
- antiplatelet therapy
- type diabetes
- high resolution
- oxidative stress
- peritoneal dialysis
- patient reported outcomes
- left ventricular
- adipose tissue
- brain injury
- cell therapy
- skeletal muscle
- smoking cessation
- transcatheter aortic valve replacement
- replacement therapy
- glycemic control
- aortic valve
- weight loss