Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-surgical-risk patients: An updated meta-analysis.
Sunny GoelRavi T PasamKaran WatsJignesh PatelSrilekha ChavaJoseph GotesmanBilal A MalikRobert FrankelJacob ShaniUmesh GidwaniPublished in: Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (2019)
The results of our meta-analysis demonstrate similar rates of all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, and stroke at 1-year follow-up in patients undergoing TAVR and SAVR. TAVR is associated with a lower incidence of AF relative to SAVR. However, there was a significantly higher incidence of PVL with TAVR compared to SAVR.
Keyphrases
- aortic stenosis
- transcatheter aortic valve replacement
- aortic valve replacement
- ejection fraction
- aortic valve
- systematic review
- transcatheter aortic valve implantation
- left ventricular
- risk factors
- patients undergoing
- atrial fibrillation
- end stage renal disease
- meta analyses
- chronic kidney disease
- newly diagnosed
- cardiovascular events
- type diabetes
- prognostic factors
- heart failure
- coronary artery disease
- peritoneal dialysis
- patient reported outcomes