Predictive value of chart-based frailty evaluation for lung transplant candidates.
Serina GeeYoon LeeAloukika ShahEhsan IzadmehrJohn BelperioYusaku ShinoSam WeigtDeena GoldwaterJoanna M SchaenmanPublished in: Clinical transplantation (2021)
Frailty, defined as a state of decreased physiologic reserve, has been correlated with poorer outcomes after hospitalization or surgery. Studies in lung transplant patients have associated frailty with an increased risk of post-transplant mortality; however, a unified approach is lacking. The identification of frail patients can help clinicians pre-emptively target modifiable risk factors and may facilitate risk stratification. The Frailty Risk Score (FRS) is a chart review-based approach based on eight symptoms and four laboratory biomarkers. We applied this method in a retrospective study to investigate its utility in predicting post-transplant lung outcomes. Eighty-four lung transplant recipients were evaluated, including 51 older (≥ 60) and 33 younger (< 60) patients. Median FRS score was 3.9, with 63 categorized as frail (75%) and 21 as non-frail (25%), using a previously published cut-off of ≥3 to define frailty. A high FRS was associated with readmission in the first year after transplantation and with the number of readmissions. There was also an association between FRS score and death (p = .047). FRS may be a viable tool in the assessment of lung transplant candidates. Frail patients may benefit from earlier referral and targeted therapy prior to transplant, as well as close post-transplant follow-up.
Keyphrases
- end stage renal disease
- ejection fraction
- community dwelling
- chronic kidney disease
- risk factors
- type diabetes
- stem cells
- prognostic factors
- primary care
- palliative care
- systematic review
- insulin resistance
- depressive symptoms
- skeletal muscle
- minimally invasive
- adipose tissue
- coronary artery disease
- mesenchymal stem cells
- atrial fibrillation
- weight loss
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- bioinformatics analysis