Evaluation of Four Rapid Antigen Tests for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection with Nasopharyngeal Swabs.
Ho-Jae LimMin-Young ParkYoung Hyun BaekHyeon-Seo LeeInhee KimYoungjin KwonYoungshin YouKyoungwoo NamJae-Hyun YangMin-Jin KimNae YuYong-Hak SohnJung-Eun ParkYong-Jin YangPublished in: Biomedicines (2023)
Owing to the high transmissibility of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants, the capacity of testing systems based on the gold standard real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) is limited. Rapid antigen tests (RATs) can substantially contribute to the prevention of community transmission, but their further assessment is required. Here, using 1503 nasopharyngeal swabs, we compared the diagnostic performance of four RAT kits (Abbott Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test, SD Biosensor Standard™ Q COVID-19 Ag Test, Humasis COVID-19 Ag Test, and SG Medical Acrosis COVID-19 Ag Test) to the cycle threshold (Ct) values obtained from rRT-PCR. The precision values, area under the curve values, SARS-CoV-2 variant detection ability, and non-SARS-CoV-2 specificity of all four kits were similar. An assay using the Acrosis kit had a significantly better positive detection rate with a higher recall value and cut-off value than that using the other three RAT kits. During the current COVID-19 pandemic, the Acrosis kit is an effective tool to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in communities.
Keyphrases
- sars cov
- respiratory syndrome coronavirus
- loop mediated isothermal amplification
- quantum dots
- coronavirus disease
- sensitive detection
- real time pcr
- label free
- healthcare
- highly efficient
- oxidative stress
- visible light
- computed tomography
- mental health
- gene expression
- contrast enhanced
- single cell
- pet ct
- dna methylation
- image quality