Improving Self-Reflection Assessment Practices: Comparative Judgment as an Alternative to Rubrics.
Liesje CoertjensMarije LesterhuisBenedicte Y De WinterMaarten GoossensSven De MaeyerNele R M MichelsPublished in: Teaching and learning in medicine (2021)
First evidence was provided for the comparative judgment method as an alternative to using rubrics for assessing students' written self-reflections. Before comparative judgment can be implemented for summative assessment, more research is needed on the time investment required to ensure no contradictory feedback is given back to students. Moreover, as the comparative judgment method requires an additional standard setting exercise to obtain grades, more research is warranted on the merits and limitations of this method when a pass/fail approach is used.