Go-activation endures following the presentation of a stop-signal: evidence from startle.
Neil M DrummondErin K CressmanAnthony N CarlsenPublished in: Journal of neurophysiology (2016)
In this study, a startling acoustic stimulus (SAS) was used to determine whether response outcome could be manipulated in a stop-signal task. Results revealed that presenting a SAS during stop-signal trials led to an increase in probability of responding even when presented 200 ms following the stop-signal. The latency of SAS responses indicates that go-activation remains accessible and modifiable well after the response is voluntarily inhibited, providing evidence against an irrevocable commitment to inhibition.